Jun
1
Shoemoney challenges Ranfish on full disclosure
Published by Hamlet Batista on Fri 1 Jun 2007 Comments

Shoemoney invited Rand Fishkin of Seomoz.org to record an interesting dialog to be aired on his radio show, next Tuesday. Rand says they discussed their opposing viewpoints on whether bloggers should fully disclose affiliate/marketing deals to readers, especially if they are endorsing those products. It is going to be a lot of fun to listen.

My personal opinion on the matter is that it’s all about trust. Trust is one of the hardest things to earn on-line. It can take a lot of time and effort to build it and if you lose it, it’s practically impossible to recover it.

The advantage of disclosing is that if the product or service mentioned does not live up to the expectations of our visitor, we can always say that we didn’t endorse it. It’s nice to make commissions for our marketing efforts but that should not be in detriment of the relationships we are trying to build with readers.

Did you enjoy reading this? Subscribe to this site! Choose from either daily email updates or our RSS feed and never miss a thing!

This entry was posted on Friday, June 1st, 2007 at 5:55 pm and is filed under . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.



3 comments ↓


Debating Blogging Disclosure With Rand Fishkin On Net Income - ShoeMoney™ on 06.05.07 at 12:14 pm

[...] Hamlet Batista  Blogging Disclosure – Debate: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (10) podPressPlayerToLoad(‘podPressPlayerSpace_779_0′, ‘mp3Player_779_0′, ‘300:30′, ‘http%3A%2F%2Fwww.shoemoney.com%2Fpodpress_trac%2Fplay%2F779%2F0%2FNI060507.mp3′); [...]

Permalink

Bill Hartzer on 06.05.07 at 4:55 pm

If you trust the person (or blogger) then you’re probably reading what they say on a regular basis. So, if you read them and they post about something (essentially they’re endorsing it) and don’t talk bad about that product or service, then does it really matter if they’re paid or not?

Consider this: if someone came to you and offered to pay you to write about their product or service and you didn’t believe in their product or service, would you really write about it? Probably not. Most likely you’d just tell them to go away or you’d delete their email if they contacted you via email.

I don’t write about or “endorse” products or services I wholeheartedly disapprove of. And if I’m actually talking bad about something–you’ll definitely know that I’m not being paid for it.

Permalink

Hamlet Batista on 06.05.07 at 5:42 pm

Bill,

Thanks for your comment.

I don’t have any problem with bloggers being paid for endorsing products.

You and I would not probably write about a product we feel is garbage, but I do think that some bloggers will, if there are enough $incentives$ Why the need to cloak affiliate links with redirects, Javascript tricks, etc?

My main concern is, that I shouldn’t need to try to figure out, if I can trust a product review or not. Jeremy says we should all be skeptical of everything, I prefer to trust as much as I can possibly can.

Permalink



Leave a Comment


 
pic2
There are many blogs about SEO. Many of them have done, and continue to do, a great job with traditional ideas. Unfortunately, knowing and doing what everybody else does is not a competitive advantage.

This blog is different. It’s about learning the most advanced SEO techniques, led by one of the industry’s up and coming SEO thinkers. Here you will find advanced search engine marketing tips and techniques that give you an edge over your competitors. The ideas are totally original: a fusion of Hamlet Batista’s own experience, research and careful experimentation, along with his readers’ questions, ideas, and thought-provoking input. Come along for the ride and explore, participate and push the limits of today’s SEO.
  » Read More